I’m well aware that the prosecution will have to prove their case at trial. And, contrary to your petulant whining about “my girlfriend,” I’ve actually taken no position on whether they will be able to do so—I’ve said let’s wait and see what evidence comes out, and what evidence is presented if/when the case gets to trial. Heck, I think they will have an awfully tough time proving second degree murder, based on the evidence that’s currently available. As to some of the more negligence-based theories, a lot will depend on the officers’ statements and other evidence as to when Gray requested medical attention, how/why the officers responded to Gray’s requests, etc.
Your entire line of responses to me has been based on my relatively benign procedural point about whether a charging decision is, itself, grounds for appeal in the event of a conviction. You’ve taken that point, and somehow turned it into me being obsessed with the prosecutor, and/or thinking she will get a conviction or convictions. None of which I have said or implied.
But sure, keep it up with the insults. It’s very becoming.
>> You’ve taken that point, and somehow turned it into me being obsessed with the prosecutor
That, and the multitude of other posts that have tried and convicted the cops without due process.
Give me a break; you’re denying whose water you’re carrying here? Your posting history is Exhibit A, and it’s open for viewing.
You are most definitely cheerleading for a railroading of these officers. Any claims to the contrary are lies.