The judges also asked why the government had buried the key precedent in a footnote in its brief. In Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, the Supreme Court decided that the language of the Anti-Injunction Act did not preclude cases like Z Streets. In a previous case before the D.C. Circuit, Judge Garland noted, the court also rejected the exact arguments the government was making, so in a way we have already decided every issue before us today, against you.