Feelings
whoa oh! Feelings whoa oh!
Andy Williams - Feelings (1975)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxhwM06lLUs
.
;may increase the publics sense of safety
and makes the public feel safer
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!
What is this country coming to?
1 posted on
05/05/2015 8:26:25 AM PDT by
HammerT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: HammerT
"merely on the basis that they may increase the publics sense of safety.
If that is truely a compelling state interest it can used to justify any encrochment on any of our constitutional rights. Including the freedom of speech vis a vis "provocative" speech.
To: HammerT
OK, what if possessing an AR and full capacity magazines doesn't make me safer, but it makes me feel safer? Why are some feelings given more weight than my feelings?
3 posted on
05/05/2015 8:30:49 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: HammerT
4 posted on
05/05/2015 8:31:35 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: HammerT
We are either going to have freedom, or we are going to have federal judges, but we are not going to have both.
5 posted on
05/05/2015 8:31:44 AM PDT by
chris37
(Heartless)
To: HammerT
To liberals, feelings and not hurting feelings is all that matters. Who needs a brain?
6 posted on
05/05/2015 8:32:32 AM PDT by
Rusty0604
To: HammerT
merely on the basis that they may increase the publics sense of safety. In spite of the fact that weapons in the hands of the citizenry provides safety.
The world is full of stupid people.
And sadly, many of them are judges.
8 posted on
05/05/2015 8:33:34 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(A moderate Muslim will cut your throat. A radical Muslim will cut off your head.)
To: HammerT
I’m emotioally upset at this decision, I find myself in the position of no longer being able to absorb or comprehend the propaganda that “smart” people among us are trying to force feed us on a daily basis!
9 posted on
05/05/2015 8:34:38 AM PDT by
heshtesh
(I believe in Sarah Palin, the rest not so much.)
To: HammerT
makes the public feel safer as a result
When they live on the south side of Chicago (/s)
11 posted on
05/05/2015 8:37:32 AM PDT by
TYVets
To: HammerT
To: HammerT
makes the public feel safer as a result, thats a substantial benefit, A government ruled by whim is a government of non objective laws.Non objective law contradicts and defies the whole reason man needs government, which is to preserve and protect natural rights of individuals, and settle disputes.
15 posted on
05/05/2015 8:39:57 AM PDT by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: HammerT
19 posted on
05/05/2015 8:43:34 AM PDT by
The Toll
To: HammerT
Happiness Is A Warm Gun__ The Beatles
20 posted on
05/05/2015 8:44:22 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
To: HammerT
Judge Manion's dissent looks water-proof to me, whereas Chief Judge Easterbrook's majority opinion seems as squishy as a wet sponge that has soaked up every bit of speculation the Brady Bunch
et al. could supply.
Therefore, I'm guessing the odds favor a reversal of Easterbrook's opinion either by an en banc decision of the full 7th Circuit or by the SCOTUS.
24 posted on
05/05/2015 8:49:32 AM PDT by
Hawthorn
To: HammerT
Strange, isn't it, how federal court judges can just overrule state legislatures, voters and the Bill of Rights by saying that whatever it is they are overruling hurts their feelings?
"Guns are not healthy for children and other living things. Consequently we disapprove the 2nd amendment." US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Court Sensitivity Administrator
25 posted on
05/05/2015 8:51:20 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: HammerT
Will a ban on young black males in hoodies and baggy pants be allowed?
To: HammerT
[sarc]
Well I know I FEEL safer when
- gays and pedofiles are not allowed to live in my neighborhood.
- unions are not allowed to organize
- Muslims are not allowed to build a mosque
- ....
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
/sarc
To: HammerT
Illegal decision.
Appeal.
To: HammerT
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Sounds pretty dang infringy to me!
Cowardly leftists!
33 posted on
05/05/2015 9:07:52 AM PDT by
vpintheak
(Call the left what they are - regressive control-freaks)
To: HammerT
I am beginning to think that maybe we should just change the national anthem from Star-Spangled Banner to “Feelings”! That is how ridiculous this country has become courtesy of Libtards.
34 posted on
05/05/2015 9:09:48 AM PDT by
Jean2
(ox)
To: HammerT
I would feel safer if liberals never again spoke in public. Does that mean we can legally infringe on the free speech rights of America’s enemies? By this judge’s logic, the First Amendment rights of democrats are at risk.
35 posted on
05/05/2015 9:12:01 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson