Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueDragon

You need to go to theconservativetreehouse.com website. Yhe police taskforce in charge of the investigation have not only refuted the illegality of the Gray arrest, but they also have evidence that refutes the prosecutors claims that no medical assistance was requested for Gray. There is audio of the radioed requests to dispatch at several different intervals that are documented by the exact time of those requests.

Also, this prosecutor, by bypassing the grand jury has opened herself up to lawsuits. I hope they go after her bigtime!


75 posted on 05/05/2015 5:37:06 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: conservativejoy

It's been a while since I did so. That site is one of those which is so loaded with scripts, that unless I have hardly anything else open on the desktop (which is like next to never) all those scripts get all hinky-jinky within the harddrive I'm using (which is a fairly modern one) making it labor so hard it sounds like it might blow up.

In other words, I confess to not having waded through each and every word, of each and every article and claim, in order to sift out the true, from the possible, from the not very likely, and was hoping you had SOMETHING else that I could go on.

Cops will say all sorts of things to cover their own backsides. Sometimes, they even tell the truth.

If the knife itself was the only thing -- then legality of arrest may be questionable. Still, if the guy was on probation (which is likely?) then the laws and rules can drastically change...

I think I caught some of that. But putting ALL the details together in an logical timeframe, outside of any party's self-interests, in neutral fashion, I've yet to see -- and right about now don't feel like going fishing through possibly dozens of articles, which then would need be further evaluated.

But thanks for the replies nonetheless.

I don't know what the rules are there, but I suppose that aspect is yet something else those with keen interest in this case could look into further. What the real hell of the deal has seemed to be, according to much of the commentary I've encountered, is that she was awfully clumsy with the charges filed against the officers, so much so that when it goes to trail -- and officers likely exonerated from what she charged them with much due to how she over-charged them, etc., then regardless how it ends it will end badly.

Thank you, power-tripper black females with giant chips on the shoulders --- you all bring us all so much joy, sweetness and light/ What would we do without you?

She does seem to have crawled (ran as fast as she could) out onto something of a limb.

I read the reports and complaints made months ago about her, by those who had long served in the State Attorney's office.

She fired more than one State attorney when they were in the middle of relatively important criminal trials, if adequate presentation of State prosecution of those accused of violent felonies is important.

When she ran for office, she said fighting crime was important.

According to reports, right off the bat she screwed the pooch (if I can get away with mixing metaphors like that, lol).

76 posted on 05/05/2015 6:44:19 PM PDT by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson