Hmmm. I wonder what the Administration will choose? Will they abstain from opening, or risk making someone angry? Hmmm.
1 posted on
05/04/2015 3:08:56 PM PDT by
gwjack
To: gwjack
Congress has no authority to pass drug laws.
If they did, why did they have to amend the Constitution in 1917 to permit the Volstead Act?
2 posted on
05/04/2015 3:12:05 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
To: gwjack
To: gwjack
Bammy wants to short cicuit the travels of the doobie...
10 posted on
05/04/2015 3:34:53 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: gwjack
Allowing one state to sue another state because of a legally passed law that has zero jurisdiction in the plaintiffs state is a VERY BAD PRECEDENCE.
To: gwjack
U.S. Supreme Court seeks Obama administration's input on Oklahoma pot... White House: "Barack? Barack's not here!"
-PJ
15 posted on
05/04/2015 4:06:29 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: gwjack
No,No, No, they were just asking which pot he likes better, Colorado or Oklahoma.
16 posted on
05/04/2015 4:10:31 PM PDT by
eyeamok
To: gwjack
Might be interesting - Federally banned (unconstitutionally banned) and legalized by some States (as the 10th Amendment would assert is their right). It’ll be like allowing an atheist to sue a Christian for being a Christian - oh...wait.
23 posted on
05/05/2015 3:15:42 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson