Posted on 05/04/2015 9:30:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
You know how Jeb Bush and other immigration enthusiasts are always telling us how conservative immigrants are, how theyre more religious and traditionalist? Appealing to their supposed conservatism is the key, we are told, to getting their votes, if only we would embrace amnesty and mass legal immigration.
There are two problems with this argument: First, theres a pretty clear consensus that Latin American and Asian immigrants (who comprise 75 percent of all immigrants) and their U.S.-born children do not vote based on social issues, assigning them low priority. Second, immigrants are not particularly conservative. There is a mountain of survey data demonstrating that, in general, Latin American and Asian immigrants and their children are supportive of bigger government and are no more socially conservative than the native-born.
In addition to survey data, theres another way of assessing the stereotype of the socially conservative immigrant their abortion rates. If the Jeb Bush storyline is correct, one would expect immigrant women to be significantly less likely to get abortions than the native-born.
Theyre not. My colleague Steven Camarota looked at that question, using an extensive survey of women who had undergone abortions. He found that immigrant woman (ages 1544) overall have nearly identical abortion rates to natives. But there are relatively few immigrants under 25, where the likelihood to get an abortion is highest; comparing only those over age 25 finds that immigrants actually have a somewhat higher abortion rate.
It only gets worse for the native-born children and grandchildren of Latin American immigrants. Their abortion rate is double that of Latin American immigrants, and more than triple the rate of native-born non-Hispanic whites. The abortion rate for the children and grandchildren of immigrants from Asia is more than double that of U.S.-born whites. Given these dramatically higher rates of abortion, its likely the abortion rate will increase as immigration changes the demographic makeup of the population.
The point here is not that immigrants and their children are somehow bad because theyre more likely to get abortions. Rather, its yet another indication of how hard it will be for Republicans to sell a conservative message in this case, opposition to abortion to groups that are likely to be less receptive to it.
But that was more true in the past than now.
The only thing Cuban voting patterns can assure us of any more is that American sugar production will continue to be protected by both Republicans and Democrats, protectionists and freemarketeers, because everyone is desperate for any votes they can get in the borderline state of Florida.
Yay! Vote for higher sugar prices! Vote for more agricultural runoff into the Everglades! And maybe your party might get enough Cuban voters to push you over the finish line in the next election ... or not if their more liberal kids and the Marxist spawn of the Marielitos decide to vote the other way.
That’s a myth. The Marielitos and there kids are as anti commie as the rest of us. Its push polling. For example the number of actual Republican votes in Cuban districts is always highrrthan polling would have suggested. The only communist Cubans are those with family in the Communist Party.
California. Case closed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.