Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rainee
The officer used his service pistol to shoot the men, who were carrying assault weapons.

Should he have used an assault pistol?

32 posted on 05/04/2015 9:02:45 AM PDT by Envisioning (4.13.15 - That awkward moment in history when 53 million racists became sexists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Envisioning
Should he have used an assault pistol?

He seems to have used a semi-automatic, high-capacity, life-saving defense weapon.

61 posted on 05/04/2015 1:50:02 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Envisioning

I’m sure to many on the Left, including those writing the law in places like CT, CA, MA, etc., it was an assault pistol. Too high a magazine capacity, no chamber status indicator, not on state approved list, and on down the litany of infringements used by those who don’t really recognize 2A rights.


67 posted on 05/05/2015 3:57:01 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson