Oh, so I calmly discuss the malicious lie that the proposal empowers the judiciary?
That would be the Alinsky tactic. Lie as a premise, and then make a discussion out of it.
If you're going to so "calmly" call me malicious and a liar, at least have the courtesy to ping me. That's considered the decent thing to do on FR. One would think after a dozen years here you would know that.
My assertion is neither malicious, nor a lie. And you haven't made any case that it is either. All you've done is personally attack. Which means you don't really have any decent argument.