What are you talking about shifting to ‘carbon trading’? You’re now evading. Answer the question who are the largest creditors of the United States? When you answer correctly the Federal Reserve, then it follows that your scarecrow hysterics are baseless.
The problem of federal debt can be addressed without your version of Chicken Little crying the sky is falling.
I knew this was coming and it is beneath you. You know well that American banks among the Fed are now among the biggest proponents of globalism and the destruction of American sovereignty. Hell, the US created the UN. They have an agenda. "Carbon trading" is the principal planned funding mechanism for that global agenda. Hence, the terms and conditions at the auction relate to extracting concessions on specific regulatory mechanisms within the government as relates to their investment portfolios.
You will note that virtually NONE of Levin's proposed amendments deal with the legal mechanics of that globalist agenda, from treaty laws or "trade deals" masquerading that are effectively treaties but without the asset of 2/3 of Jaquerie's precious and supposedly sovereign States. Unless and until we can get even a simple amendment fixing the manner of treaty ratification, unless we can get a ruling from the SCOTUS that these trade deals are unconstitutional as "international agreements" instead of treaties, NONE of what Levin or anyone else proposes is going to happen in his planned convention, the terms of which are every bit as likely to contain a poison pill as did the original Constitution.
If we can't abide by this document and we have governments nationwide that ignore their State Constitutions just like the Feds do in DC, a new supreme law of the land portends even worse. I won't go there.