Posted on 05/02/2015 11:02:32 AM PDT by IChing
On April 29th the Washington Post ran an explosive article highlighting information from a passenger who was inside the transport vehicle at the same time Freddie Gray was driven toward central booking. According to the Washington Post source: Freddie Gray was intentionally “trying to injure himself“.
On April 30th local Baltimore media outlet WBAL-TV introduced Donta Allen, a person they claimed was the passenger in the transport vehicle.
However, THEY ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON.
Our research indicates the office of Baltimore State Attorney, Marilyn Mosby, used or allowed one of her deputy State Attorneys, Janice Bledsoe (who was in charge of the investigation as assigned by Marilyn Mosby), to willfully and intentionally place a false story using Bledsoe’s lover, WBAL-TV reporter Jayne Miller, and thereby create a fictitious story to imply Donta Allen as the passenger outlined in the Washington Post story.
Yes, you read that correctly.
The full story: The Washington Post does not specifically name the passenger who heard Freddie Gray attempting to injure himself. However, they do provide details as to the identity – details we can independently confirm (emphasis mine).
BALTIMORE — A prisoner sharing a police transport van with Freddie Gray told investigators that he could hear Gray “banging against the walls” of the vehicle and believed that he “was intentionally trying to injure himself,” according to a police document obtained by The Washington Post.
The prisoner, who is currently in jail, was separated from Gray by a metal partition and could not see him. His statement is contained in an application for a search warrant, which is sealed by the court. The Post was given the document under the condition that the prisoner not be named because the person who provided it feared for the inmate’s safety.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
You’re mistaken if you think I give a rat’s rump. Zap me with your FR drone or whatever already.
I posted this morning. The OP was updated and title changed at 2:30 edt. Updated to develop more of the Don Lemon befuddlement. This thread here is based on the updated version.
It’s a series of comments. But I really have no time nor sympathy for anyone who has such contempt prior to investigation that they have some hang-up about going to another site. What the hell has happened to FR over the years? Like some kind of Jonestown cult
No.
First - I wish Jim would increase that 100 character limit. You run into it a lot.
Second, until then, maybe best to just delete any over 100 and leave ... to indicate omission and paste in full title at initial comment box
Hmmm. Why more aren’t screaming from the rooftops about this fake impostor aspect is vexing. Must be attention span deficit
Thank you my friend. When I checked to see if it had been posted, I was surprised to see no result. This explains it.
The ComDem Lie is something we will continue to be challenged with. They have no options, they certainly cannot “tell the truth”
Well...OK.
It’s actually better that you think I’m a noob
Yep, it is. I’d say purposeful understatement, I admit.
I don’t want to put too much stock in to anything related to this matter at this time, because it is really hard to ah pin down I guess exactly what is real and what is not.
One thing I know for certain at this point is that there are lies involved with what is going in in the Gray matter. I’m suspicious of the state, and I mean highly suspicious, but I’m going to take time and watch closely.
Just for the sake of discussion, if I took what is in this analysis as Gospel, I’d say this is am an absolute outrage, and people prosecuting this case need to be arrested right now.
And that may well turn out to be exactly what is going on here.
That must mean you’re a retread.
In case you missed it
Media and Blogs: Free Republic Not Source of Bogus Freddie Gray Story; FReepers Helped Debunk
Well, here you go, Sundance’s reply to someone asking about the apparent discrepancy:
“Electronic data time, as opposed to real time story telling is always a precarious proposition to compare.
“Example: A reporter might say a suspect was arrested at noon (witnessing him being picked up, handcuffed and/or put in cop car), but the suspect might not be processed through booking (prints, id and mugshot) until 3 or 4pm which shows as his electronic arrest time.
“You can’t rely on the summary data without inspecting the specific documents (reports) of the arresting officers for accurate times.
“A suspect could sit in holding, or be in the process of being processed per se’. So timeline comparisons are only good for approximately am or pm type comparisons.”
Been through all this already. Got anything worthwhile to contribute regarding the topic of this thread? The details of the hoax “witness” foisted forward by the BGI/State’s Attorney’s office?
Okay, thanks buddy.
Saw it. FR was merely an also-ran on that one.
There's currently 328 comments posted. And a lot of them link additional source material to help connect dots. Hope this helps.
I’m putting it in the same catagory as the “ game changer: slager was tasered” story.....I will believe it when I see some evidence other than a blog post.
Oh my!
That's equally as credible as Yu-Gi-Oh quotes.
Question:
What incentive has someone posting anonymously to be accurate??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.