Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37
I don’t think the examiner is saying that the bolt caused lethal injury,...

Then it was misinformation given on Fox News because that was how they reported it.

29 posted on 04/30/2015 11:18:36 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

Hmmm. I can’t comment on that, because I did not see that, or at least I do not remember seeing it on Fox.

Just going strictly on that story I linked-

““Sources said the medical examiner found Gray’s catastrophic injury was caused when he slammed into the back of the police transport van, apparently breaking his neck; a head injury he sustained matches a bolt in the back of the van.”

It seems like the examiner is saying that hard contact with the back of the van caused the catastrophic injury, and that the bolt related injury illustrates, demonstrates or otherwise proves that at some point his head contacted the back of the van containing that bolt with sufficient force to leave the mark of that bolt.

Looking at those pictures posted in this thread, I do not see a bolt that is large enough or protruding to such an extent that contacting it would cause mortal injury. But I do see what looks like rivets or something like that on the back door that could potentially leave an mark if one hit one hard enough.


33 posted on 04/30/2015 11:26:36 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson