Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski
Inasmuch as the Government is already involved in "marriage" in who-knows how much of existing coda, having all of the established law overturned by 9 individuals in the Judiciary branch is FAR beyond the scope of what the Framers intended… The matter should be put back under the jurisdiction of the States; if one State wants to set its own rules through the respective Legislature, including recognizing the civil union status of parties from other States, that should be their purview.

Plus as has been noted already, the can of worms will be completely emptied in that the Institution won't be limited to just two people, where you'll see unrelenting efforts to legitimize polygamy, polyamory – not to mention other deviant lifestyle "desires".

60 posted on 04/28/2015 4:39:56 PM PDT by mikrofon (SCOTUS Bump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mikrofon

The glowing articles about the fantasy Thai homosexual men three-some wedding, the lesbian “throuple” in the UK, the two lesbians on the West coast who added a guy and advertise it as so great that each baby has both a mommy and daddy.


77 posted on 04/28/2015 5:53:15 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson