I personally have downloaded it and I am reading it. Much of the study is flawed. Its predictions are often guesswork... Always pays to do your homework before you post, doesn't it?
Would have saved you a lot of thrashing and misplaced name calling, as well as all the personal embarrassment you have sustained while insisting on making excuses for yourself.
Had you done your homework, one hopes that what appears to be your natural inclination toward trepidation would likely have been somewhat better tempered.
"Study to show thyself approved unto God ..." (II Tim. 2:15) is applicable to one's day-to-day research every bit as much as it is relevant for the study of Scripture.
Take this opportunity to learn to do your research before you post.
You'll be happier for it.
As I said in the beginning, I disagree with your assumption that people can not read an article and make up their own mind.
However, you are entitled to your opinion and there is probably some value added in including analyses with the post.
But why did you have to call me:
“pied piper of defeatism”
“nothing more than a dissembling leftist.”
“an exhibitionist mouthpiece for liberalism”
Why did you say:
“you accepted what the liberal article said hook, line, and sinker, giving a platform to the lie, and now you are hiding behind the skirts of the author.”
“you believe the premise of liberalism saturated article — and it was your intent to drive the discussion toward suckering others into validating that same premise in your own mind.”
You also said I had no balls.
Every time I tried to explain my position I was falsely accused. If, in my frustration, I said anything inappropriate I apologize.
