Everything you have said is wrong.
I posted the article because people should be aware of what is being written about Christians. I said that before but you did not understand so I will repeat it again for you.
I was hoping it would generate intelligent responses. It did. There were over 80 responses so far. Most of them were honest reflections on what is going on today.
It also provoked one weird personal attack, yours.
I tried patiently and politely to explain why your attack was inaccurate and that I disagreed with your assumptions.
You came back with a weird, incoherent personal attack saying that I have no balls. You are so brave from behind your computer.
I have tried to speak to you intelligently, it did not work.
No, you posted a liberalism saturated article, and did so uncritically, because you believe the premise of liberalism saturated article -- and it was your intent to drive the discussion toward suckering others into validating that same premise in your own mind.
I didn't let you.
I called you out on it.
And it's as simple as that.
You failed to make any cogent critique of the premise of the article, and all your excusatory, defensive commentary aside, what you have really shown yourself to be has been little more than an exhibitionist mouthpiece for liberalism.
And that's all.