Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CIB-173RDABN
Governments have few legitimate functions, providing access to clean water both for humans and crops could be considered one such function.

How do you feel about taxing one group of people to provide low cost water to a different group?

11 posted on 04/28/2015 5:36:39 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Do you know water right law in California? I don’t but here you buy long established water rights whether from a body of water or underground aquifer.

When you buy property you get domestic use right and the amount of water is strictly defined. As an example, if you buy an acre and build a house you have enough water right to provide your needs and a lawn and a couple of trees. If you buy 50 acres the water right doesn’t increase, you get just that domestic use.

On agricultural land the rights were already established by the early Spaniards who settled here or were acquired through the federal government by homesteading and are long-standing, they don’t make new ones. No one uses water without that water right, communities, industry or agriculture.

So anyway, you own the rights to a certain amount of water and you pay nothing for it except delivery costs. It is a property right and there aren’t that many in this arid state. Agriculture is not subsidized they actually own the water and pay for the means of delivery.


14 posted on 04/28/2015 5:59:04 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson