[eastforker]

That is correct, he is a strict constitutionalist, That is what this country needs.And the SC has already ruled that porn is protected under the 1st amendment.

[9thLife]

A "strict constitutionalist" isn't governed by the opinions of the supreme court if said opinions are clear mockery of the spirit of the law and or the intent of the Founders.

And anyone who argues that propogation of pornography is exercising the Founders' intention of "free speech" is also engaging in mental masturbation.