Posted on 04/27/2015 9:55:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
Gay people in America are among the most self-righteous and intolerant people there are. The most recent gay backlash against two of their own for stepping out of line shows just how deep politically correct intolerance runs in their community, especially in ultra-liberal bastions like New York.
Ian Reisner and Mati Weiderpass are two prominent gay businessmen in NYC and the owners of OUT NYC, a hotel catering primarily to gay people. Reisner is also Jewish and a supporter of Israel, and last week he hosted a small reception for Senator Ted Cruz from Texas. The dozen attendants discussed foreign policy, but Cruz and Reisner both acknowledged that their views on gay marriage were polar opposites. Cruz is against gay marriage, Reisner is ardently supportive.
Now the NYC gay community is calling for a boycott of OUT NYC and urging gay people to shun Reisner and Weiderpass. The organizers of the Broadway Bares Solo Strips fundraiser, which raises money for AIDs related causes, have canceled their bares solo strips event in protest of Weiderpass and Reisner hosting Cruz. Executive Director Tom Viola explained that organizers could not "in good conscience" host the fundraiser at a venue "whose owners have alienated our community."
Now, Reisner and Weiderpass have spent years supporting gay causes. But apparently the mere act of meeting with a politician unpopular with the gay community is enough to alienate them from their community. In an open and free society, people should be encouraged to openly exchange views with people they disagree with, but in NYCs ultra-liberal gay community, it is akin to an act of treason, and the traitors must be boycotted and shunned as social pariahs.
It reminds me when I was a student at Georgetown University Law Center. I was widely despised as an ignorant and backward homophobe, as I was more than once called. I was even the subject of several editorials in the student newspaper denouncing me personally.
Now, I have been an ardent supporter of gay civil rights and specifically gay marriage for almost four decades, long before it became fashionable to do so. I believe under our Constitution, all our citizens should be guaranteed certain basic rights. And Id like to suggest to my fellow conservatives that that is the direction the wind is blowing.
So why was I reviled as an ignorant and backward homophobe? Well, it began with my comment in a constitutional law class that I saw no reason to give gay applicants special preferences in admissions to universities. I argued that it was an entirely false argument that students could not understand legal issues related to gay rights issues without having a certain number of homosexual students present. And the mission of the law school and fairness were both better served by admitting the best qualified students, whether straight, gay, white, black, male or female.
But what really got me in trouble with the PC police was when I added as a humorous aside, besides, gay people are incredibly boring. Now, that was considered far, far worse than saying gay people are going to Hell to burn in eternal agony for their sin of sodomy. It is a shibboleth of liberals that gay people are simply more fabulous than straight people: better fashion sense, cooler nightclubs, and the admirable bravery to proclaim their gayness in places like Manhattan and GULC (where of course theyll be feted and congratulated).
Ive known a lot of gay people, and from time to time have read gay magazines like The Advocate, just to try to understand a different culture. Well, by and large, its a culture obsessed with cruises and cruising, and not in the least bit interesting. But in certain ZIP codes in America, mostly the ones where the elites of our country reside, saying that is strictly forbidden, ipso facto proof of bigotry and narrow-mindedness. In fact, it is these same elites are often shockingly bigoted, narrow-minded and intolerant of any opinion they dont like.
I have no problem with any group of my fellow citizens demanding the same civil rights I enjoy under the law. In the America I believe in, we are all equal before the law. But the respect of fellow citizens must be earned, not arbitrarily demanded. And where we can express honest differences of opinion without being threatened with harm or being cast out socially. These are principles most ultra-liberals simply dont understand, unfortunately.
ahahah POST OF THE WEEK!!!
Honestly, would it surprise anyone?
>> Truths about sodomites, like truths about blacks
Quite the inexact generalization. Sodomy represents behavior, Black does not.
No one who is familiar with Mrs Waco would be at all surprised...
wow..1993...twenty two years ago.....
Dude! That was like 22 years ago! It’s old news!
/Idiot White House mouthpiece
The Harf haf Spoken!!!
Hell hath no fury like a bitchy faggot scorned ...
I honestly if any Spox there since Barry was imaculated actually remembers to wipe. I’m dead serious. The sheer level of stupid those fools have displayed goes beyond paid retardation.
Edit: Honestly WONDER
theyre all part of a plan to stun us into silence...
the shock value of being confronted with one lamebrain after another... is clearly part of the alinsky playbook
That pretty rainbow flag shows which house down the street to tell your grandkids to stay away from. If it was a requirement rather than a choice to brag of their affliction they’d yell “discrimination”.
I believe it. Gaslighting at it’s most evolved.
My biggest pet peeve - that because people’s attitudes about baseline scriptural truths are changing, the law has to change with them. It’s why I hate polls about who should do what about what - WHO CARES what a bunch of people who probably don’t have any clarity on the issues think about an issue?
this nitwit has paraded out such a stunning endless variety of braindead dopes as spokesmouths..cabinet members.... ambassadors
The Gaystapo wants to make People who don’t really care what they do into unabashed Supporters, or else.
Anyone remember the hoopla that followed after Sarah Palin used the word “Tolerate” when speaking of Gays?
OMG, how dare she Tolerate them? That isn’t good enough,
she should embrace their Lifestyle. She was labeled a Hater for being Tolerant.
Sorry Folks, it isn’t good enough to just Live and Let Live.
The few times I use the "N" word it is in response to BEHAVIOR by a black/blacks, not just because of their race. I try to NEVER use GAY to describe homosexuals; they stole a perfectly good word and polluted it (and the rainbow, too).
Squirrel! works. Even if it means taking a PR hit for putting the little rodent out there to begin with. Two steps toward Utopia, one back. Classic communism.
TRUTH: It's the new hate speech.
Just like that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.