Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10

They are hitting small Christian businesses whose owners probably don’t have the resources to get the best defense, or the best advice. They left Chik-Fil-A alone, for the time being, until they have set enough precedent to attack businesses of that size, and there aren’t many of them anyway, which openly don’t support the sodomite agenda. We see now that they’re going to push against Chik-Fil-A-they are apparently feeling it’s getting time to take them on. What other business of comparable size has taken a public Biblical stance against the sodomites?


32 posted on 04/25/2015 8:56:07 PM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmel; All
"They are hitting small Christian businesses whose owners probably don’t have the resources to get the best defense, or the best advice."

If Christian business owners were to get themselves up to speed with a few references associated with Section 1 of the 14th Amendment then they could get legal counsel up to speed; situation is a little bit bass ackwards. Constitutional protections are no more difficult to learn, imo, than a child’s board game.

“3. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” —United States v. Sprague, 1931.

33 posted on 04/25/2015 9:07:47 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson