Posted on 04/24/2015 5:33:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Anyone who goes into a debate with Ted Cruz, goes unarmed.
Warren/Cruz, Cruz takes 49 states. There’s always one in the crowd.
Abrasive manner?
“....Americans’ attitudes tend to the political left, even if they often conflict with what Americans say and how they vote.”
So this author says Americans’ are actually leftist even though what they say and how they vote says otherwise. Friggin moron.
My money is on it being Massachusetts.....
I love how the author answers the question of big vs small government by saying “small but...” and then lays out a few things that a government could do while implying “anyone in favor of these things really wants a big government” as if those things are where the bloat comes from.
Let’s see. A compassionate NWO communist - Benghazi Clinton or a Stalinist NWO communist - Bernie Sanders or an intellectual elite NWO communist - Lizzie Warren or an autocratic egocentric NWO communist - O’Malley or an all around a$$ NWO communist - Schummer or finally one LSD shot too many NWO communist - Moonbeam Brown ..... just so many choices, all bad!!!!
Hmmm, I sure wonder who the stealth Conservative pretender is going to be. Actually, that has become crystal clear.
The GOPe is here and working their little fingers to the bone. Couldn't be more obvious.
He's lying.
I cannot imagine, for the life of me, how Elizabeth Warren is qualified for President.
Sure, she can WANT to be President. That’s fine. People can want what they want. But she is not the least bit qualified. I think we need only remind the public what a less-than-one-term senator has done for us and to us over the past six years.
The general American public must be a lot more stupid than I thought.
I think she’d be very hard to beat.
The journ-0-lists will push the economic populism angle hard.
Her Groupons for student loan forgiveness lock in the under 30 vote and her Soc Sec increases get the old folks.
Throw in a black or hispanic VP, bring in Axlegrease and Plouffy to run the show, and you have a winning candidate.
Yeah, that caught my eye too.
Forceful, passionate, driven, maybe, but abrasive?
On second thought, truth is supposed to be divisive, maybe that’s what they meant to say.
I just don’t understand people these days.
It’s the media.
The media used to be strongly pro-Democrat but independent.
In 2008 with the nomination of Baraq Obama, they became integral members of the progressive regime.
I’m old enough to remember when the “deficit” was actually talked about by the media.
Now it doesn’t even exist in popular discussion.
So a candidate like Warren can promise more gravy to the masses with no fear of being asked how the hell is that sustainable?
The ‘Rats will always put up the leftmost leftist.
It would be nice for once if the GOP can resist putting up their own leftist, and go with a Centrist like Cruz.
That’s right, Cruz... can’t be any more centrist than him.
Picture it. This lady debating the best debater Princeton has produced since our Founding Fathers (IMO).
Ted Cruz knows how to debate WITHOUT NOTES and without tremendous prep-work, and he can debate both sides of an argument.
Plus, he is actually nice as he does it.
Most people can't argue without getting all hot and bothered.
I would rather enjoy a Cruz-Warren debate, or anyone else the libs can line up.
Daily Digest Ted Cruz Ping! Ted Cruz Ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
