Replies

Typical bogus paraphrase from NYT saying Cruz said “he would have no problem” if a daughter were gay when in fact he said he would love her just as much. That’s not the same thing.

The NYT changed their article and removed "Mr. Cruz said he would have no problem if one of his daughters was gay." The NYT did not acknowledge their error. They just made the change. The damage was done, of course. The NYT, IMO, knew exactly what they were doing, lied, and then changed their article after the lie had been repeated in countless blogs. Mission accomplished from their perspective.

RE: Cruz said “he would have no problem” if a daughter were gay when in fact he said he would love her just as much

I would personally be saddened if my daughter were gay, but yes, like Cruz, I would love her just as much.

But I would NOT want her to have a sexual, much less a marriage relationship with another woman as counsel her as much.

There is a HUGE difference between loving a person and accepting a sinful lifestyle.

Jesus loved (AGAPE in Greek) the adulterous woman and did not condemn her, yet, the told her to SIN NO MORE. I would say the same to my daughter.

THAT is what liberals ( like the folks at the Times ) do not seem to get.