Its quite interesting that NYT and WaPo are both on board with the destroy Hillary campaign.
It is possible - barely - that WaPo is on the story because its a big, legitimate news story (I mean, how BOLD was it of the Xlintons to actually declare her candidacy knowing all they have to hide?).
But NYT, a/k/a American Pravda? That they are on board is very significant, because it means all is not well in commieland. Hillary! has acquired some very powerful enemies on the Left.
Let's put on our PR hats, shall we? Why tell us this now? Consider the sources. This cannot possibly be a simple "news" story.The "Destroy Hillary" story-line might be subject to a variety of interpretations:
(1)
By bringing up the slings and arrows at this point in the campaign, Team Hillary may be delivering a pre-emptive strike. Get the potentially damaging material out in the open, so that it can be sliced and diced over the summer of 2015, so that by the time the real campaign season opens up a full year from now, by then the machine will have completely spun the bad stuff. Besides, remember we are dealing with an electorate that cannot name its own representatives, nor the capital of their state, much less know who, what or where Ben Gazzee is. They will have long since forgotten anything brought up this year.
(2)
The NYT and WaPo may have so surrendered the wits of their "editors" to The Obama Admin, Valerie Jarrett, and other people of color who must be obeyed that they have slavishly taken up Obama's side in his war against the Clintons. Remember Bill Clinton is a true racist whose first thought about Barack Hussein Obama was to "send him out for coffee." The instructions might be "Dump Hillary. Break ground for Warren or O'Malley."
BTW, never forget my personal favorite DemoTicket, Joe and Michelle!
(3)
Maybe the Left senses a McGovern-type debacle in the wings and wants to switch over to a less polarizing candidate.