Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Much More Can Hillary! Take? The New York Times Strikes Another Blow at the Dowager Empress
Pajamas Media ^ | 04/23/2015 | Michael Walsh

Posted on 04/23/2015 1:27:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Martin Tell
OK, it stinks and looks really bad, but is it criminal?

Yes, at least according to Rush. He said that there is a specific statute relating to this.

Will she be prosecuted? No, unless Obama wants her to be prosecuted.

21 posted on 04/23/2015 1:40:09 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
But we have to ask the question, who is the left wing media lining up to take her place at the last minute? I’m betting on Michelle.

The press will sell whoever the aparat tells them to sell. I doubt it would be the Mooch. That's a bridge too far. It'll be Warren and/or O'Malley; whoever VJ and the Chicago marxists think they can control and keep their reign of terror going.

22 posted on 04/23/2015 1:48:47 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What difference does it make? Her followers won’t understand what the Times brought up. Its of no interest to them, they are completely robotic when it comes to Hillary. “All hail Hillery, victory will be ours.” That’s what it has come down to. The bureau of Hillary Media Propaganda will triumph.


23 posted on 04/23/2015 1:52:49 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (2016 The RNC better come up with a Winner this time. Run some one like Cruz and Go for Broke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Evita Peron 2.0


24 posted on 04/23/2015 1:52:59 PM PDT by dynachrome (Government can't give us anything that it doesn't first take away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Whadaya mean, “what did they do in return for the donations”? It was pay to play from the beginning.

Bill maneuvered donations into the Foundation, of which the three Clintons took a percentage and divided from something marked as, “overhead”.

That small percentage amounted to millions that sustained their travel expenses and lifestyle.

The frosting was the 1,000,000,000.00 total dollars Bill Clinton made over the course of ten years, from global honey pots around the world, and most of it while Hill was at State, to “okay” the donor’s global interests, and then turn a convenient blind eye to her enforcement duties against donors who skirted international and US sanctions against rogue nations like Iran—all to enrich themselves.

The donations paid for her influence, her okay, and her blind eye toward them for making many millions. Had she done her job there would be no donations for her services of this magnitude, perhaps, no donations at all.


25 posted on 04/23/2015 1:54:05 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK; SeekAndFind

Okay, too many zeros there.

Bill made a million in speech money over ten years. His half million dollar speech payments were only during her four years at State.


26 posted on 04/23/2015 1:57:40 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She can thank O’bama for her ‘lost chance’ at potus run. Probably thought the upstart as JV team, until ‘lots’ of Dems went over his side real early on in the primaries.

The feud between these two camps for the years to come will be Veeeery Inter-resting.


27 posted on 04/23/2015 1:58:40 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I wonder what is with all of this piling on of Hitlery? I thought they loved her as much as they do Obama. sarc/


28 posted on 04/23/2015 2:04:03 PM PDT by Jean2 (ox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
 photo get_zps4f45prdf.jpg
29 posted on 04/23/2015 2:04:17 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Looks like there is a specific quid pro quo and hence criminal conduct (unless the Clintoons try to slide with the excuse that they got no actual cash on the deal, just their "charitable" foundation did). From the article:

"Since uranium is seen as a strategic asset, which is important for national security, the deal would have to be approved by the committee, which included representatives of several US government agencies. Also needed a signature and the State Department, which at the time was headed by the wife of former President Hillary Clinton, "- the article says. The publication writes that Canadian documents show that during the process of transferring control of Uranium One.

Charitable Foundation Clinton received three separate transactions during 2009-2013's. In total, the fund was transferred to 2.35 million dollars. In this case, the Clintons did not disclose who transferred the money, despite Barack Obama's initiative regarding the disclosure of all donors.

Hillary! should be toast, but I stand by how hard it is to nail these crooks. Remember we had Slick dead to rights with a felony rap; he skated and is now widely considered some sort of national treasure.

30 posted on 04/23/2015 2:07:10 PM PDT by Martin Tell (Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
OMG!..MY EEYES!

31 posted on 04/23/2015 2:13:21 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Any girl can be glamorous. All you have to do is stand still and look stupid." Hedy Lamarr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; kingattax
She will NEVER admit to failure. Even when the world sees her as a humiliated woman she will not recognize it.

She is going to have a very difficult time convincing the voters that she would be a worthwhile president, other than her stalwart supporters - hookers and gays.

No matter how much money she is able to throw at us, she is through.

32 posted on 04/23/2015 2:14:58 PM PDT by Slyfox (If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

Say hello to President Hillary in 2017. Satan takes care of his own.


33 posted on 04/23/2015 2:15:18 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hmmmm, this stinks to the high heaven. On one hand I would love to believe that the MSM is awakening from its Obama love fest slumber in an attempt to reclaim credibility. But I just can’t believe that. That leaves, in my mind, two possibilities:

One: The MSM is not happy with having the Clinton wing (who they view as centrist) as the nominee and want to knock her out for another candidate.

Two: They know she has a mile of baggage and want to get it all OUT and out of the way as soon as possible. That way, come election time, the old playbook of “that is old news” can be trotted out again.

I suspect it is option No. 2.


34 posted on 04/23/2015 2:24:55 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

[I’m betting on Michelle.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3264614/posts
It won’t happen this year but when the Clinton Machine has been thoroughly decimated and the democrap party is in a crisis created by the 0 Machine.


35 posted on 04/23/2015 2:34:07 PM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

100,000,000,000.

Bill made 100 million in speeches. By selling influence.


36 posted on 04/23/2015 2:36:38 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

How Bill ever cheated on her is mind boggling!


37 posted on 04/23/2015 2:42:32 PM PDT by navet97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jean2

[I thought they loved her as much as they do Obama.]

Her problem is that 0 has absolute power over media and he will allow them to attack her like a pack of dogs until she and her husband are both ripped apart.


38 posted on 04/23/2015 2:43:30 PM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Yeah, author apparently doesn’t know what ‘dowager’ means.


39 posted on 04/23/2015 2:48:47 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (My hope for America died 11-06-12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
Schumer? Warren?

One Democratic activist said her money is on former Virginia senator Webb, who is not a favorite of the left but of those more towards the center.

40 posted on 04/23/2015 3:00:41 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson