On the last post to me, I made the statement that you can read. Perhaps I was wrong. If you can read, it is easy enough to see what I actually said and to what I responded. Do your own dang homework - unless it's too much work and trouble.
If you were really paying attention instead of just bouncing key word/phrases against your ingrained memes, you would know that i am donating time and money to Cruz - I just think it's less than smart to destroy Walker at this stage of the game - unless one is more interested in looking for excuses if something happens to the Cruz campaign. If actually adding comments to explain one's stance is "ridiculous and hyper-emotional", it helps explain why so many are prone to posit something and then stick to nuanced generalities and why we continue to lose so much.
Let me help you focus.
You were ridiculous and hyper-emotional when you made the claim that Freepers were the allies of Salon when it comes to criticism of Scott Walker.
Who is “trying to destroy” Walker? (See what I mean?) I see criticism of everyone who’s running or likely will be. That’s par for the course here during primary season.