Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

Reagan came into Washington at ‘a different time’...and certainly Washington wasn’t packed with Muslims and various other anti-Americans to the degree we have now in our government operating against us.

For me we need a President who has been inside that beast and watched it operate these past 8 years...Cruz would know where the weak points are and where to strike against it without the adjustment time an outsider is going to need.

Time is significant because the world has despots and leaders who are currently reading themselves and acting knowing in mind a change in the Presidency is forthcoming.

I can truly say that even with 9/11 happening... I have not sensed as much danger to our country as I have with this Administration and those who have been purposely brought into it over these past 8 years and operating against this country.

So the time element is significant. And someone who is already familiar with the happenings “inside” Washington.


38 posted on 04/22/2015 6:01:37 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: caww
I prefer Cruz, not because he has an edge in experience, or that he knows Washington better, but because he has the best ability to present the vision of a full conservatism as THE great path to revive America. He's persuasive, and gives it from the heart, much like Reagan.

He also handles the media, and media gotchas better than anyone since Reagan.

That's why I prefer him, I don't think either of them have an edge in knowing how to handle Washington. But then again, as I said earlier, neither did Reagan. One thing, we both prefer the same guy.

40 posted on 04/22/2015 6:17:16 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson