Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: WHY DO WE MAINTAIN GUN-FREE ZONES ON MILITARY BASES?
Breitbart ^ | 21 Apr 2015 | AWR HAWKINS

Posted on 04/21/2015 11:50:46 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

On April 19, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) told gun owners at a Litchfield, New Hampshire, hunting club that it is past time to examine gun-free zones on military bases and to find a way to change the policy so soldiers can protect themselves.

Cruz cited three gun-related attacks in gun-free zones since November 2009 to emphasize his point: Fort Hood (2009), DC Navy Yard (2013), and Fort Hood (2014).

These attacks were all carried out on military installations by gunmen who passed background checks for their firearms. So the situation has not arisen from a lack of gun control, but from conditions created in a climate where there is so much gun control that innocent people cannot defend their own lives.

According to Politico, Cruz said, “I am very concerned about that policy. I think it’s very important to have a public discussion about why we’re denying our soldiers the ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights.”

Cruz told gun owners in Litchfield that he is “pressing” Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain for “hearings on whether soldiers should be allowed to carry their own concealed firearms onto military bases.”

Military gun-free zones were implemented just months into the Clinton presidency. The Washington Times reported that “one of President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; cruz; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: conservativejoy

“Gov Walker also banned guns in State buildings in violation of State law.”

Source, please.

I did a quick search, did not find it.


21 posted on 04/21/2015 6:33:08 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

The ban has been in effect for a long time. I believe it was put in effect shortly after WWII.

For most of that time, installation commanders had the discretion to make their own rules on the carry of arms by soldiers.

There was a real problem with moral after Vietnam.

Now we have an all volunteer, professional army. They are very good. A cheap way to increase security, without political blowback, is to allow those that take the trouble to obtain a concealed carry permit to do so.


22 posted on 04/21/2015 6:39:08 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

jsonline.com/news/statepolitics from Nov 30,2011

Also, Redstate article “Twelve Reasons Not to Vote for Scott Walker”.

There are others. I just typed in “Scott Walker ban on guns in State buildings” in the google search bar.


23 posted on 04/22/2015 6:22:23 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson