Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin; ansel12; Jack Hydrazine; 2ndDivisionVet; BlueNgold; Thud; G Larry; Michael.SF.; ...
As I understand this, Proposition 218 was put on the ballot in 1996 by the Howard Jarvis organization because the politicians wanted to get around Proposition 13. Proposition 13 limited taxation and the yearly rate of increases to property. Apparently the politicians saw water rates as a way to raise revenue in lieu of the limits on property tax increases. So, the Howard Jarvis Organization put Proposition 218 on the ballot to limit the money Government can receive from supplying water to the actual costs of providing the service. Brilliant!

Proposition 218 came to the rescue of Proposition 13.

18 posted on 04/20/2015 7:34:48 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

It was a lot more than that. Local governments were demanding that developers turn over 5-10% of any property they intended to develop as fees for various things. The state government was going overboard with excessive fees too.


23 posted on 04/20/2015 8:02:53 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson