And then you've got to answer the question as to why the molester had homosexual inclinations. At some point some person, who had never been molested as a child, started molesting children of his or her sex. Where did that come from?
YOU are the one who made the “only logical” constraint, not me.
Sexualized as a child, close to it. Yes, sexual abuse of children is a lot worse than we think it is, especially by mass media.
What we know about homosexuality is that it leads to early death, debilitating defect, psychological devastation, and deadly disease. Those are not debatable. They are fact.
Nor is homosexuality natural. Since all sexuality is about procreation of the species, then homosexuality creates nothing.
So, what the 'genetic' special pleading has to do is come up with one reason why a deadly, unnatural BEHAVIOR could be inherent in a species. It certainly isn't explained by evolutionary principles and the survival of the fittest. And nature's God has amply demonstrated that it is unnatural.
So, WHY would such a genetic characteristic be carried forward? It doesn't enhance the species in any way. At best, it would be viewed as a defect. AND, there are no studies clearly demonstrating that this horrible defect is carried forward. Which is what one would expect.