[MHGinTN]

Actually, the aerodynamics are not going to allow a plane that size to fly that low along the supposed path to impact the Pentagon at ground level. That lie was exposed very early on by pilots of many stripes. Besides, the initial hole was too small for a plane that size to have impacted the outerwall, as shown on ABC by accident before the upper floors collapsed.

The core of the towers turned to dust, so even if the 'pancaking of the floors had happened as told by the agents of government psy-ops, the core should have been standing there without floors attached. The box columns were massive and would not have melted away. They were truned to dust, somehow.

[AppyPappy]

Actually, plane have been known to land on the ground. It happens more than you think.

[odds]

>>>”Actually, the aerodynamics are not going to allow a plane that size to fly that low along the supposed path to impact the Pentagon at ground level..........”<<<

Again, to my unexpert/untrained eyes, it looks like it’d be very hard to hit a low level building such as the Pentagon, with a plane of that size (a Boeing 757?) and with that degree of accuracy, as it was done.

>>>”Flying is not that hard once the planes are in the air. Even I have flown a plane.”<<<

AppyPappy, Am sure flying the planes once they are airborne isn’t hard. Takeoff, landing and hitting something at such a low level (not the towers) & accurately are different though.