Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker

That’s very interesting.

I looks like we went with the Army version. Was that found to be a better version than that of the Navy?


47 posted on 04/19/2015 6:29:33 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: PapaNew

Dutch women and children sitting on a Sherman VC Firefly tank of Lord Strathcona’s Horse (Royal Canadians). Harderwijk, Netherlands, April 19, 1945. Photograph by Captain Jack H. Smith.

49 posted on 04/19/2015 8:04:09 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: PapaNew
I would say events overtook the Navy's plan to land on the China coast.

Early in the war it seemed logical to culminate the island hopping campaign by establishing a base on Formosa to support a landing in China. Japan had so many resources in China, plus it seemed we would need a China base to invade Japan.

The Army, and MacArthur in particular, strongly argued for a Philippine invasion in light of the promises made the Philippine people and the faster than expected success in New Guinea. Taking the Philippines made an assault on Formosa unnecessary. Later, the senior leadership realized the Philippines in conjunction with the Marianas bases and Okinawa could be used to stage an invasion of the home islands without any bases in China.

Plus, in 1944 the Chinese suffered many reverses and we eventually gave up our B-29 bases in favor of the Marianas, so it didn't seem necessary to engage Japan in China.

60 posted on 04/20/2015 10:37:15 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson