Replies

Talisker I hope you are ok something tells me me maybey you are going thought some stuff that aint to good and i wish you well prayers up to you and your family i was not trying to get into a hissy fit with you

Well what a tender thing to say, al baby. Except - except it doesn't make much sense. Oh, your prayers for me are wonderful and all, but tell me, how is it you could write to me "Did the cat use your bowl of cereal this morning for a litter box?" and NOT be trying to get me "in a hissy fit"?

And for what did you sling your little hissy fit at me? Over what subject? For my response (which the mods deleted) to yarddog, where I said about Hillary "There is nothing that will kill the monster. She will just keep coming back to life.". Because you see, in that reply I said a dastardly thing to yarddog.

I said: "grow up."

To which yarddog righteously replied: "Grow up? What the hell is wrong with you? Did I make you mad some time ago without knowing it. I don’t appreciate hateful remarks which just come out of the blue and have nothing to do with what is being discussed."

Now as you can see, those are some pretty intense accusations of being wounded. Liberal levels of woundedness, actually. So I decided to put his claims into perspective. But then I did a terrible, terrible thing: I called him a "snowflake," for which (presumably) the admin mod immediately swooped in and deleted my post because... well, just look at it. yarddog already declared my initial reply hate speech and irrelevant. So what's left? Microaggression! Triggering words! You know, having the temerity to disagree with him.

And then, then... yes, I admit it... I called him a "snowflake."

I know, I know, now it's negative centigrade sensitivity training classes for me. And I offer no excuse because, really, what excuse could there possibly be for such an egregious violation of another person's very humanity - to subzero temperatures, no less?

Nevertheless, in the interest of providing a record for the archives, my response, (minus the terrible "s" word, of course) was as follows:

LOL, you write, in response to a revelation of further Hillary scandals linked to her emails, "There is nothing that will kill the monster. She will just keep coming back to life." and then you are outraged that YOU weren't taken seriously over the SUBJECT MATTER?

WHAT subject matter - "monsters"? Or is is "monsters that come back to life"? Or is it the actual belief that the entirety of our legal system, and out country itself, is completely helpless against Hillary, because she must be considered some sort of trans-dimensional being who no one can ever defeat? THAT is supposed to RELEVANT? And calling you a child for taking such a position is somehow "out of the blue" and "hateful"?

Well listen up - I consider trying to seriously undermine conservative efforts by literally invoking childish beliefs in unkillable monsters hateful, insulting and yes, it pisses me off. How DARE you speak down to conservatives that way, insult their intelligence, and then act offended when you're called on it? Why are you even here? Really, why? The monster is going to get everyone anyway, the unkillable monster you're so afraid of. So run and hide and hope the unkillable monster doesn't get you.

And that's it - the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. To which you offered the prayerful, loving, "Did the cat use your bowl of cereal this morning for a litter box?"

So thanks for the prayers, al baby. I hope they were sincere, because otherwise you're using prayers as merely a manipulative online argument technique, and that would be a sin.