The only thing I can really add is this, regardless who we each individually support, let us not destroy any valid options should our guy (or gal) not get the nomination. Ive got some issues with each of the candidates. Rubio is a good example. Certainly there is an issue with his immigration stance, but it pains me to see conservatives seek to destroy him when he has the 4th highest conservative voting record in this country (among candidates 2nd only to Ted Cruz, and higher conservative voting record than Scott Walker...Mike Lee is 1st overall for the record).
The LAST thing we want is a Hillary victory, and although I would add that Jeb Bush would be the second to last thing we want, I have a 9 year old daughter and it seems to me that I would be jeopardizing her future to take the stance that some take in saying Id rather see Hillary win than a RINO who doesnt live up to their principles, because then people will really see the damage of Progressive-liberalism. To me thats just idiotic. I will advocate for the strongest conservative direction possible, but should Rubio be the one to take on Hillary, I wont spend the months leading up to that convincing people he would be a disaster because there are a few things I disagree with him on. No, four to eight years of Hillary would be the catastrophic choice.
Thanks for that sensible answer.
I have great concern about some conservative voters who are seeking only a pure candidate. There is no one who is pure as the driven snow, and that includes Cruz and Walker [who happen to be at the top of my list].
One thing I am certain of - a Hillary Clinton presidency following the disastrous leftist administration of the current POTUS is an unthinkable result.