Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

Not true. She beat Obama in the elections. She just didn’t pay attention to the caucuses and he was able to take advantage. Just a pure miscalculation ulation.of resources.


19 posted on 04/16/2015 7:58:06 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

True enough. Hillary got more votes in primary elections vs. Obama, but, he had the advantage in delegates selected in states which did caucuses instead of primaries.

I was surprised when I learned that. Just considering that the Clintons had been through presidential primaries/caucuses before, and had been successful, it was surprising to me that Hillary and her people just didn’t pay attention to the caucuses. They didn’t organize well for the caucuses. I remember that her people were surprised to learn that the state of Texas had both a primary and a caucus to select convention delegates.


35 posted on 04/16/2015 8:18:45 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson