Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster; EternalVigilance; Hebrews 11:6; colorado tanker; Homer_J_Simpson; dfwgator

The issue is what FDR acquiesced to at Yalta. Once the Yalta deal had been cut, yes, it would have been an exercise in futility for our armies to counter the political decision already made.

My problem is with the political decision leading up to and at Yalta. I think it resulted in the suffering, misery, and death of millions at the hands of Stalin who, if you do a body count, was much more vicious than Hitler.


32 posted on 04/16/2015 11:33:18 AM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: PapaNew; EternalVigilance; Hebrews 11:6; colorado tanker; Homer_J_Simpson; dfwgator

My contention is the opposite. Yalta was the recognition of an already accomplished unalterable fact. The Red Army had occupied Romania and Poland, and was well on their way to occupying Eastern Germany, Czechoslovakia and Hungary. There was absolutely nothing we could do to keep that from happening. Having occupied those countries, and having brought the commissars with them, they were not going to leave short of military action forcing them out. And as we’ve pretty much conceded, that wasn’t going to happen either.

As far as “what if’s” I refuse to violate henkster’s law.


33 posted on 04/16/2015 11:50:02 AM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson