Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

But fully predicted, 2000 years ago.


48 posted on 04/15/2015 9:13:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN; P-Marlowe
Used to be, commentators tried to find a 'god' who was either called or associated with 'the desire of women'. I've seen some asking lately if that could mean "homosexual". In the Young's Literal I can see it as a possibility. In any case, that part is sandwiched inside parts about 'gods'.

YLT Dan 11:37 And unto the God of his fathers he doth not attend, nor to the desire of women, yea, to any god he doth not attend, for against all he magnifieth himself.

KJV Dan 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

49 posted on 04/15/2015 9:27:48 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson