Expessing an observation of a candidates persona as it relates to expectations of a President IS proper vetting.
Comparisons are made all the time to illustrate impressions that candidates give. My statement was not even intended as ridicule, but was the clearest illustration that comes to mind when I listen to and observe Scott Walker. The issue of “presence” is a valid one. If no one else sees this, I’m fine with that, but I won’t except a scolding for expressing my opinion. This was a mild comment compared to many on this site. Thread after thread have lambasted candadates, some of it ridiculing them, many of them hilariously so. Mitt Romney was the nominee, for Pete sakes, way past the vetting process, and he was grilled daily! If any Republican candidate can’t stand the scrutinty here, they are in the wrong race.
Sure.
Let’s do things the same way we did in 2008 and 2012.
Maybe we’ll get the same wonderful result.