Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iron Munro
It was all done for political and military advantage, not for humanitarian reasons.

The motivation for declaring slaves in the Confederacy to be free was to create confusion and trouble for the Confederacy by encouraging slaves to rebel and act as a sort of Guerrilla force behind Confederate lines.

The proclamation was also a sop to the Abolitionists who were exerting great political pressure on Lincoln to do something.

The primary reason for not freeing slaves in the other areas was to keep the border slave states from joining the Confederacy.

Exactly right. It was underhanded, deceitful and cynical, and even Secretary of State William Seward was appalled by it.

"We show our symapthy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."

That alone ought to be proof that the Union reasons for war had nothing to do with slavery, and everything to do with stopping Independence for Southern states.

97 posted on 04/10/2015 7:56:59 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Exactly right. It was underhanded, deceitful and cynical, and even Secretary of State William Seward was appalled by it.

"We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."

Great reference - Thank you.

Historians and teachers have made Lincoln into a near-god. But at heart he was in the presidency because he was a politician, not a humanitarion.


141 posted on 04/11/2015 4:55:00 AM PDT by Iron Munro (It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson