Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tzfat

Lincoln “apologists” (and the rest of us too!) answer that question all the time. The answer is exceedingly simple - because he didn’t have the authority to unilaterally do so. He knew that it would take an amendment to the constitution to free all of the slaves.

See how easy that was?!


279 posted on 04/11/2015 3:52:20 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr
Lincoln “apologists” (and the rest of us too!) answer that question all the time. The answer is exceedingly simple - because he didn’t have the authority to unilaterally do so. He knew that it would take an amendment to the constitution to free all of the slaves.

So how can you have a War to free the slaves, when it required a constitutional amendment?

By the way, what was the date they initiated that constitutional amendment? Because surely it was before the war, seeing as how that was the whole purpose of the war, wasn't it? Obviously the Union would want to do things proper and constitutional, and of course that would commence with the amendment process, right?

282 posted on 04/11/2015 3:59:14 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr

So he did not have the authority to free slaves, but he did have the authority to jail, without trial, the entire elected legislature of the sovereign state of Maryland?

If Obama did half of what Lincoln did you would rightly denounce him as a tyrant. You can thank Lincoln’s unchecked tyranny and several generations of school children educated in Lincoln deification for the destruction Obama has brought to America.


289 posted on 04/11/2015 4:20:46 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson