Anyone could say that. That is the mating call of the pro-choice movement. "Yes, in general, I'm pro life but..................."
Would Hillary have answered that any differently?
I’ve listened to Rand Paul on this subject. He’s not as bad as Mitt Romney with his ‘health of the mother’ and he’s not as good as those who say ‘life of the mother.’
He seems confused by all the medical knowledge he has and refers to unusual medical conditions and exceptions that non-medical people aren’t informed about.
He was right to take the Debbie Wasserman to task over late term (full term) abortion, but Rand Paul needs to define for HIMSELF when life begins. Then he needs to apply his libertarian principle of life and liberty for distinct individuals. ANYONE who defines life at conception OR EVEN THOSE who define it at implantation CANNOT justify the violation of rights of the unborn.