Whatever the “theoretical” holding of RvW, the practical upshot is not to care if the baby is viable. — So, to care even about that is superior to the practical upshot.
Huh?
Are you saying that a candidate who supports the holding of Roe v. Wade would be acceptable as opposed to a candidate who believed that viability was no concern?
Do you really know Paul's position on Abortion after that interview?
I sure don't.
He turned the question from support for abortion to whether the DNC supported killing a "viable" fetus in the womb.
Nice tactic, but it leaves the question of whether he would support a 4th or 5th month abortion as a libertarian right.