Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Iran Deal and Its Consequences
Wall Street Journal ^ | April 7, 2015 | Henry Kissinger And George P. Shultz

Posted on 04/09/2015 3:15:48 AM PDT by iowamark

The announced framework for an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program has the potential to generate a seminal national debate. Advocates exult over the nuclear constraints it would impose on Iran. Critics question the verifiability of these constraints and their longer-term impact on regional and world stability. The historic significance of the agreement and indeed its sustainability depend on whether these emotions, valid by themselves, can be reconciled.

Debate regarding technical details of the deal has thus far inhibited the soul-searching necessary regarding its deeper implications. For 20 years, three presidents of both major parties proclaimed that an Iranian nuclear weapon was contrary to American and global interests—and that they were prepared to use force to prevent it. Yet negotiations that began 12 years ago as an international effort to prevent an Iranian capability to develop a nuclear arsenal are ending with an agreement that concedes this very capability, albeit short of its full capacity in the first 10 years.

Mixing shrewd diplomacy with open defiance of U.N. resolutions, Iran has gradually turned the negotiation on its head. Iran’s centrifuges have multiplied from about 100 at the beginning of the negotiation to almost 20,000 today. The threat of war now constrains the West more than Iran. While Iran treated the mere fact of its willingness to negotiate as a concession, the West has felt compelled to break every deadlock with a new proposal. In the process, the Iranian program has reached a point officially described as being within two to three months of building a nuclear weapon. Under the proposed agreement, for 10 years Iran will never be further than one year from a nuclear weapon and, after a decade, will be significantly closer.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/09/2015 3:15:48 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

http://www.redstate.com/2015/04/08/kissinger-schultz-iran-deal-brings-region-closer-nuclear-war/
“Kissinger and Schultz: Iran deal brings region closer to nuclear war”


2 posted on 04/09/2015 3:18:16 AM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Bammy is a looser and America suffers...


3 posted on 04/09/2015 3:21:46 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I would sure like to rrad the whole article without subscribing to the WSJ.


4 posted on 04/09/2015 4:19:36 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

Google the article title and click on the link.


5 posted on 04/09/2015 4:22:04 AM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson