Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

That’s why the next stage has to be without nation building, but in this case nation-subduing.

Strategically speaking, occupying Afghanistan and Iraq would have been the first stages of taking out Iran, surrounding the country. But that was squandered in favor of appeasement of the “religion of peace” and allowing both occupied countries to rebuild Islamic governments with Islamic constitutions and ever-greater enmity against Israel—with copious help from the US treasury. Things turned quite liberal on the USA’s part following the initial successes.


40 posted on 04/08/2015 12:51:43 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai
"Strategically speaking, occupying Afghanistan and Iraq would have been the first stages of taking out Iran, surrounding the country. "

Again, precisely correct. And I thought that was the plan!

We had 80,000+ mean on each of Iran's borders, the ESSENTIAL ENEMY of civilization in the world today, and we didn't have the will to pull the trigger.

SHAME ON YOU GW BUSH.

49 posted on 04/08/2015 1:04:08 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson