Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servantboy777

“Seems I remember, the energy source was far lower than the output.”

Wikipedia:

Kanzius acknowledged that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil, asserting only that his discovery was “thought provoking”.[


36 posted on 04/08/2015 9:18:55 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator
>>...as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil<<

Go back and listen carefully to the video and follow up with other videos of University research. This is not what I took from it.

Oil will never go away. We need it. It will drive our economy for the remainder of this century for sure.

Also, this is Wikipedia...not sure I'd consider them a reliable source of information.

40 posted on 04/08/2015 9:29:05 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson