Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
Someone else will pay for it... the evil rich.

But that is the problem they have. If they "tax the rich" enough to fully pay for their pet programs, the few rich that don't move their wealth to other countries will go broke. You could tax the "evil rich" at 100% and still not be able to pay for all of the leftist programs we have right now. The only way they are supported right now is by massive borrowing and by taking the true cost of Social Security and Medicare off the budget.

24 posted on 04/05/2015 8:29:08 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

I have heard of analysis that shows if we taxed the “rich” at 100% and confiscated their wealth, we could fund the government for less than three months. Balancing the budget by taxing the rich is foolish. It is a an appeal to an emotional marxist attack upon private property. As is so much of the nonsense going on today. Happy Easter All!


35 posted on 04/05/2015 8:53:29 AM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative

Do you think the average recipient cares about that? I think they do not.

BBA doesn’t curtail profligate spending, it only mandates a balanced budged. It relies on the hope that increased taxation would become politically unpopular. I think that unpopularity threshold is very very high, the mobocracy will demand more and more until there is nothing but high taxes and poverty.


38 posted on 04/05/2015 9:12:40 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson