Posted on 04/05/2015 7:35:49 AM PDT by cotton1706
Conservative state legislators frustrated with the gridlock in Washington are increasingly turning to a plan to call a convention to consider a new amendment to the U.S. Constitution — an event that would be unprecedented in American history and one that could, some opponents predict, lead to complete political chaos.
Legislators in 27 states have passed applications for a convention to pass a balanced budget amendment. Proponents of a balanced budget requirement are planning to push for new applications in nine other states where Republicans control both chambers of the legislature.
If those applications pass in seven of the nine targeted states, it would bring the number of applications up to 34, meeting the two-thirds requirement under Article V of the Constitution to force Congress to call a convention.
What happens next is anyone’s guess.
“There really isn’t much of a precedent. We’ll be charting new waters,” said Utah Senate President Wayne Niederhauser, a Republican and a supporter of a constitutional convention. Utah became the 26th state to issue an application last month. North and South Dakota have also approved applications this year.
The problem is that while the Constitution allows amendments to be adopted and sent to the states by a two-thirds vote of both the House and Senate, or by a national convention called by two-thirds of the states, the founding document is silent on how such a convention would operate. How many delegates each state would receive, the rules under which a convention would operate and who would set the agenda would be left up to Congress — all of those would be open questions.
(Excerpt) Read more at standard.net ...
Terminate and defund.
This might sound like a good idea, but the powers that be are never going to let anyone else write a new Constitution.
Post #49, please.
-—and one that could, some opponents predict, lead to complete political chaos. -—
As if a group of nine judges who make law based on penumbras isn’t chaos. Or a president who uses the Constitution for toilet paper.
Whatever amendments are proposed by the convention have to be ratified by the states, just like amendments proposed by Congress. Sheesh.
The first proposal should be congressional term limits.
How can anyone doubt who is really running this country? Do you really think that these gangsters are going to turn the country over to a bunch of "regular folks" and hope for the best?
Sell the buildings.
Did you read my post or simply scan it at a surface level?
But there’s one branch of those powers that has more power than the rest of them combined—the people.
Did you really think the powers you name have absolute control?
Who's talking about doing that?
You know that libs and “moderates” will turn up as well, correct?
Why do you think they have to disguise everything they do?
You’re speaking of people who will follow the crowd. They’re not independent thinkers.
The problem is not our Constitution, but our having wandered away from it. The left is always looking for chances to water down the original document. This opportunity could backfire.
The past week in Indiana could be a good example. What started out as a document that sured up the rights of religious people was joined by the left and became a document that protected the “rights” of gays. Just a thought of what has to be guarded against.
They are in the minority. Many will probably boycott, because they're like that.
Well, that's the design.
This brings up a few questions:
How well are we following the Constitution's design now?
How well is the President following his oath of office?
How effective is Congress holding him to his oath?
How well is the Supreme Court upholding our Constitution's design?
If we were closer to following the Constitution in the first place, I would encourage this convention. But we're not.
I know. Damn the questions and blowback. Full speed ahead.
Federalism: Yesterday and Today", and
Reflections on the 82nd Anniversary of the New Deal.
I've explored this area in uncomfortable detail.
In the long run, the strategy of “use their strengths against them” will lose. Whether it’s utilized by the communists or by the Iranians.
Here’s why: the strategy reveals that you have no real strength of your own.
That’s been my question also,if they(Gov) don’t abide by the constitution now,(which they don’t ), how are new amendments going to be enforced ?
“You know that libs and “moderates” will turn up as well, correct?”
The legislatures will appoint the delegates, and if there are liberal or moderates who propose amendments, they’ll be subject to a vote just like any other amendment. And like any other amendment, should they be approved by the delegates at the convention (voting by state), then they will need to then get through 38 legislatures.
I don’t fear this process just because people who don’t agree with me might be there to propose their own ideas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.