Replies

This is the full question and answer from State’s website:

Question: One of the things that the prime minister said was that any final deal that’s reached in June, if that happens, needs to demand that Iran recognize Israel’s right to exist. Is that an appropriate thing to include in a deal of this sort, in the U.S.’s view?

MS. HARF: Well, this is an agreement that is only about the nuclear issue. We have purposefully kept that separate from every other issue. That issue is complicated enough to deal with on its own. No, this is an agreement that doesn’t deal with any other issues, nor should it, and that’s what we’re focused on.

14 posted on 04/03/2015 7:24:32 PM PDT by Dave346

Damn these clueless morons to hell.
The people of Israel LIVE!
NEVER AGAIN!

19 posted on 04/03/2015 7:30:33 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)

Is that an appropriate thing to include in a deal of this sort,

This leading question was a setup, a plant perhaps, to elcit the answer "no".

34 posted on 04/03/2015 8:10:29 PM PDT by Praxeologue ( ')

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794