Replies

What the New York Times is calling for is well written and very reasonable. There is only one problem. The New York Times selectively applies these standards to enemies of OBAMA.

Hey New York Times, how about the same article for:
Harry Reid
Nancy Pelosi
BJ Clinton
Hillary Clinton, what is a little graft corruption,
dereliction of duty, lying under oath
memory lapses that are worthy of an
Alzheimer's patient, that only seem to
strike under oath, passing state secrets
etc. etc. etc. also bribery remember the
cattle trades.
and the list of her other crimes is
long.

And last but supreme is Obama’s undermining of the constitution, repeatedly lying to the American Public, usurping the power of a spineless gutless Republican Legislative Branch, refusing to enforce the laws which is a sworn oath, using the IRS and the Justice Department as a “legal Gestapo” against conservatives. His list of crimes is even longer than Hillary's.

When the New York Times applies the same standards to all they will then again become the “Paper of Record.” Today they are nothing but the political arm of the far left of the Demoncrat party. Even Pravda would be ashamed.