Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Go_Raiders

There’s a danger there too. You’d end up with the Federal Government becoming a significant (or even majority) shareholder in a number of corporations.


38 posted on 04/01/2015 8:44:45 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog

Bullfeathers. All that is needed is sector funds, individual company stocks are too much of a gamble. It would take over 18 trillion dollars to become the majority stakeholder in all US companies and there is no way that the federal governement is going to go all in instantaneously.

If the US started down this path, it would drive investment as individual investors would want to ride the wave of new money flowing into the market. It would attract even more foreign investment because the US stock market would have a reduced downside risk. I would estimate annual GDP growth at anywhere from 5 to 7% for the foreseeable future if we just redirected the SS contributions into a mix of 20% Treasuries, 20% High Quality State and Local Bonds and 60% Total Market Index.

The increased tax revenue from economic growth would be more than enough to pay Social Security benefits to current recipients, with a phase out for younger participants. As an added benefit, it would allow the Fed to discontinue Quantitative Easing and market forces would be less distorted.

And most important, it would signal to the rest of the world that investment is the key to the future, and countries all over the world would start doing the same with their social security funds.


87 posted on 04/02/2015 11:56:53 AM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson