Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackAdderess
I've read your post several times and have to speak up.

This is silly...a terrible witness...

It appears you've taken it upon yourself to decide what expressions of religious belief are valid, IE, deserving of constitutional protections. That in and of itself flies in the face of freedom of religious belief.

I do not fear businesses being required to follow civil law, how else are you going to be able to operate if everyone doesn’t follow the same ground rules?

Who has said that businesses shouldn't follow civil law?

What's being said is that is a bad law and violates constitutional protections.

122 posted on 04/01/2015 9:35:07 AM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: gogeo

I am very happy with churches and religious organizations receiving protections from having to hire as church leaders people who hold heretical doctrines and views. You can’t run a marketplace though if in addition to the current mountain of red tape every entity out there has the right to impose its own regulatory authority over every other entity or individual they deal with. Can you imagine the B to B?!


132 posted on 04/01/2015 10:05:08 AM PDT by BlackAdderess ("Give me a but a firm spot on which to stand, and I shall move the earth". --Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson