Posted on 03/31/2015 10:20:46 AM PDT by EveningStar
A gay wedding is mockery and a party that celebrates buggery.
A Christian wedding is a religious Sacrament that unites a man and a woman as a unit and honors God, procreation and God’s creation.
Presbyterians are about as “Christian” as Unitarians
If the objection is on religious grounds then why wouldn't catering to homosexuals period be a violation of their religious beliefs?
Why are you helping spread liberal lies? The “No GAYS” signs is an absolute lie being spread by the left.
Because they still love them as people. They’re not against their existence, but do not believe in taking part in their weddings.
That makes no sense to me. Homosexuality is sort of OK? It's kind of sinful, but only under certain circumstances?
Bosma’s lying?
RE: The “No GAYS” signs is an absolute lie being spread by the left.
The article does not say that there are “NO GAYS” signs. It does say that having those signs will be permitted by this bill.
So, you’re saying that the folks identified as the Senate Pro Tem and Speaker of the House did not say what the article claims they said?
It says in the article:
“Indiana’s Senate Pro Tem and the Speaker of the House held a joint news conference admitting that “No Gays allowed” signs would be permitted in areas within Indiana.”
” Brian Bosma, Speaker of the House and the Senate’s Pro Tem David Long acknowledged that homophobic shop keepers will be allowed to display “No Gays allowed” signs.”
“No gays signs being allowed is also a colossal lie.”
If so, somebody should tell the Senate Pro Tem & Speaker of the House,
It is all bullshit.
I don’t understand why you cannot grasp that it is not the individuals they refuse to serve; it is the fact that they will not participate in the ritual that they believe is wrong.
RE: It is all bullshit.
What is? The report, or what these folks said?
We are denied lodging in many places when traveling with our dog. Rather than expect the hotel to change its policy, we find places that are pet friendly.
Nobody is asking them to come to the wedding, just bake a cake.
This isn't a simple issue. On the one hand you have people's right to practice their religion as they see fit. On the other hand a person has the right to expect to be served regardless of who they are. But when you have a person's deeply held religious belief being labeled "discrimination" then I think that a person's religious beliefs should take priority, especially in the case of something as unnecessary as backed goods or photographs. But I also think they have an obligation to make it clear who they will serve and who they will not serve because of their religious beliefs. So I think they should clearly display their position, and people will buy their product or not buy it based on that position.
What about photographers? They would have to be there.
Thank you, Martin. And, thanks for the additional details of evidence. It’s nice talking to you.
This is basically a Lefty propaganda non-story taking up a lot of displaced oxygen for the uninformed who are willing to become lathered up over it. Because the Speaker of the House and Pro Tem made remarks that were edited to show their confusion hardly makes the case against the truth of the legislation. When the Marxists perform a pile on, that’s a tip that freedom is under fire.
BTW, I LOVED Cyd Charisse too!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.