Article VI of the US Constitution (excerpt):
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
The American people voted to install an ineligible President on Jan. 20, 2009, void the US Constitution, void the United States Code, fire all US executive and judicial federal officers from all three branches of government, except Obama and Biden, and fire executive and judicial officers of the various states.
The votes, bills, proclamations or any other product of the legislatures of the various states have been voided after the installation of an ineligible President. Only the People of the United States, Obama and Biden have authority to call a convention for development of a national governing document.
Don’t you need a ruling of ineligibility by some official body, somewhere?
Just saying that a president is ineligible isn’t enough to motivate anybody to do anything.
As a federal judge once said: “A spurious claim questioning the president’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”—
Rhodes v MacDonald, U.S. District Court Judge Clay D. Land, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, September 16, 2009.
So if there’s no valid government, then is this scenario viable?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3276032/posts?page=2#2